Scott in the Primary School: Past and Future

Summary of the Talk:

Eileen Dunlop reflects on her experience teaching Sir Walter Scott's works in primary schools, particularly in the context of Scotland's evolving educational landscape. She discusses her own education in the 1940s and 1950s, contrasting it with the reforms and innovations in primary teaching that she witnessed as a teacher during the 1960s and 1970s.

Dunlop emphasizes the challenges of introducing Scott to young readers, especially in the modern age where shorter attention spans and digital distractions prevail. While Scott's works might seem daunting, she believed in making literature engaging by connecting it to students' real-world experiences, such as through the study of Edinburgh's history, which naturally linked to Scott's writings.

She recounts how she brought Scott into the classroom through creative projects, including reading "Young Lochinvar" and "The Heart of Mid-Lothian," and tying these works to local history and geography. Dunlop's teaching approach was not just about reading, but involved creative activities like drama and model-building, which helped students connect with Scott's world. However, she notes that Scott's more complex works, such as The Heart of Mid-Lothian or The Two Drovers, often proved too challenging for young pupils.



Dunlop also discusses the educational reforms of the 1960s and 1970s, such as the Plowden Report in England, which influenced primary teaching methods. She highlights how the curriculum shifted towards a more student-centered approach, emphasizing creativity, critical thinking, and interdisciplinary projects. She also reflects on how the perception of education shifted from preparing children for a life of leisure (in a society dominated by manual labor) to one where students face greater demands and longer working hours.

In terms of the future, Dunlop expresses cautious optimism, noting initiatives like Lee Simpson's work to introduce younger students to Scott's works in an engaging, interactive way. She suggests that Scott’s work might be revived in schools through external programs, such as creative writing or music projects, and hopes that these efforts will help preserve his legacy.

Interesting Points to Mention:

1. Historical Education Comparison: Dunlop vividly contrasts the education system she experienced in the 1940s, dominated by rigid methods and limited resources, with the more progressive teaching methods that emerged during the 1960s. This shows the transformation of educational practices over time and the evolving role of literature in the curriculum.
2. Teaching Scott through Geography and History: One of her innovative methods was integrating Scott's works with geography and history lessons, particularly using Edinburgh as a focal point. By doing so, she made Scott's writing more accessible and connected to the students' environment.
3. The Challenge of Scott’s Complexity: While Dunlop was passionate about introducing Scott to young children, she acknowledged that some of his works were too complex for primary school students. This highlights the need for careful selection of texts to ensure they are age-appropriate while still capturing the essence of Scott’s themes.
4. Educational Reforms and the Impact on Teaching Literature: The discussion of the Plowden Report and the subsequent educational reforms provides insight into how teaching methods have changed over time, focusing more on child-centered learning and creativity.
5. The Future of Scott’s Legacy: Dunlop's belief that Scott's works might not return to widespread popularity in schools but could still enjoy a revival through external educational projects speaks to the potential for revitalizing interest in classic literature by adapting it to modern needs.

Download the [transcript]