Scott and the Centenary

Summary of the Article:

Hugh Walpole reflects on the legacy of Sir Walter Scott, particularly during the centenary of his death in 1932. Walpole argues that Scott’s reputation is now at risk of being diminished or misunderstood, primarily because his works have become so ingrained in the cultural fabric that they are taken for granted. He acknowledges that Scott’s works may be criticized by contemporary readers who find them outdated or unexciting, often due to the new wave of literary styles that prioritize terseness, epigrams, and pessimism.

Walpole identifies himself as a passionate supporter (or "fanatic") of Scott and argues that the true value of Scott's work lies in his creation of timeless characters—figures whose traits remain relevant across generations. He stresses that Scott’s influence goes beyond his historical novels, and that he was a poet of Scotland, capturing the essence of the country in a way that no one had before.

Walpole also addresses the criticisms that Scott romanticized or falsified history. However, he counters that the beauty of Scott’s works lies not in perfect historical accuracy but in the emotional depth and human nature that transcends time. He concludes by urging readers to reconsider Scott with a fresh perspective, emphasizing that the current moment offers an opportunity to rediscover his work.

Key Points of Interest:

1. Timeless Characters: Walpole praises Scott’s creation of characters whose traits are "unchangeable in human nature." He mentions a range of Scott's memorable characters, like Dandie Dinmont and Rob Roy, highlighting their enduring relevance.
2. Criticism of Historical Novels: Walpole challenges the notion that Scott’s works should be dismissed solely as "historical novels" and insists that he should be recognized as a novelist in its broader sense. His characters and narratives, he suggests, transcend the boundaries of a specific time period.
3. Relevance of Scott’s Work in the 20th Century: The article argues that while Scott's works have been undervalued by modern critics, the centenary offers an opportunity for a new generation to appreciate them. Walpole believes that Scott’s work will resonate once again in a fresh critical context.
4. The Role of a National Poet: Walpole elevates Scott’s status as a poet of Scotland, emphasizing that he captured the country's spirit in a unique and lasting way, particularly in works like The Minstrel and The Lord of the Isles.
5. Re-evaluation in the Post-War Literary Context: Walpole suggests that post-war literature has shifted dramatically to the left, with new authors focusing on realism and cynicism. This shift has, in his view, left little room for the romanticism that Scott embodied, but there is now a potential for a re-evaluation of his contributions in a new literary atmosphere.

This article, written in the context of the 1932 centenary, underscores the ongoing importance of Scott’s legacy and calls for a deeper, more appreciative engagement with his work in the modern literary world.